Showing posts with label Outside the bizniz realm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Outside the bizniz realm. Show all posts

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Notes on marriage equality

Dear pals,

A close, but somewhat blog-shy friend sent me an email commenting on my last post. Since s/he is such a wicked smart person, I wanted to share his/her comments with you all. Here, then, without editorial comment, is the note [Hope that's okay blog-shy pal!]:

Gay marriage is something that I have a hard time with--not because I'm agin it, but because I think its advocates are making lots of mistakes that play into the hands of their opponents.

First, let's not pretend, as I heard some people say in the California debates, that this is such a fundamental right that it may not be subject to the political process. In the world of fundamental rights, it's an extremely recent discovery, and I think it's unreasonable to expect people to accept it as such simply because some Supreme Court or another said so. As with Roe v. Wade, it is a political mistake, as well as something that's extremely damaging to our political and social fabric, for an unelected council of "wise men" to yank a contentious issue out of politics when the nation as a whole isn't anywhere near a consensus. Lead, certainly--but not by so much that the bulk of the people can't even see you.

It was absolutely critical, in the case of gay marriage in Massachusetts, that the otherwise spineless, corrupt, and generally contemptible legislature finally came up with the intestinal fortitude to vote on a petition to amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage (after the SJC had made it a right)--various of the legislative "leaders" were trying all kinds of shenanigans to let the petition die without a vote, in clear violation of the state constitution's clauses dealing with amendments. Because they voted, even though the amendment didn't get enough votes from the legislature to be put on the ballot (and therefore died), the opponents of gay marriage could no longer argue that they'd been shut out of the process.

I don't think the opponents of gay marriage generally have good, solid, well-reasoned arguments to use--there aren't any. But. Tradition, visceral reaction to change, visceral reaction to hearing that your cherished beliefs, learned at your mother's knee, are primitive and irrational, visceral reaction to hearing that you have nowhere in politics to express those beliefs... You have to deal with those things, too. Time will work. Patience will work. Bullying, not so much. Judicial decrees, in this context, count as bullying. Let the legislatures with the stones to address the issue do so, and eventually the rest of the country will be too embarrassed not to follow.

Friday, June 26, 2009

What’s threatening YOUR marriage?

A new blogging friend wrote recently about our country’s current, and hopefully temporary, inability to support same-sex marriage. I blogged about this briefly in the past, but I’m pissed again and need to vent.


Small-minded opponents to same-sex marriage say that it threatens “traditional” marriage. How ridiculous is that? My husband, whom I’ll call Archie, and I don’t argue about whether or not Sid and Tony should get married. No, the top three things that married couples argue about are: sex, money, and in-laws [I know, I can’t believe I quoted Dr. Phil either!]. I can assure you that my marriage to Archie would not be in the least bit threatened if Rob and Dave, our neighbors up the hill, were to marry each other. Quite the opposite: their 23-year bond is an inspiration.

Clearly, this threat-to-traditional-marriage bs is a specious smokescreen for what they really object to, but for the life of me, I can’t imagine what that might be. Some words in an ancient document written and re-written over the past 2000 years by unknown sources [sorry, I know this comment might offend some of you, but I just have to say it]?

I’m so ashamed of what used to be the most progressive state in the union, my adopted state, California, for passing the hateful Proposition 8 last November. I think we should decouple marriage from our secular government altogether. We should all get civil unions, gay and straight, and civil unions should come with all the protections that are now applied to marriage. Then if religious folk want to seal their union in a church of their choosing, go dog go!

Kids, I’m standing in my cubicle now, red-faced, banging my fist on the desk. I better sit down and get back to work before I get fired or something.

What do you think?